Arab Region | Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (Arab countries, 1990–2020)
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.
Publisher
Arab Development Portal
Origin
Arab Region
Records
289
Source
| Year | Location |
value
Min
Max
|
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Yemen | 11.73 |
| 2006 | Yemen | 6.46 |
| 2015 | Yemen | 5.14 |
| 2016 | Yemen | 4.35 |
| 1994 | Saudi Arabia | 10.72 |
| 2007 | Saudi Arabia | 3.77 |
| 2008 | Saudi Arabia | 3.25 |
| 2009 | Saudi Arabia | 3.13 |
| 2013 | Saudi Arabia | 3.57 |
| 2014 | Saudi Arabia | 3.39 |
| 2015 | Saudi Arabia | 4.45 |
| 2020 | Saudi Arabia | 4.23 |
| 2006 | Sudan | 10.19 |
| 2008 | Sudan | 8.22 |
| 2010 | Syria | 7.23 |
| 2020 | Syria | 9.21 |
| 2002 | Tunisia | 26.38 |
| 2003 | Tunisia | 22.15 |
| 2004 | Tunisia | 22.4 |
| 2006 | Tunisia | 18.26 |
| 2016 | Tunisia | 9.35 |
| 2007 | United Arab Emirates | 3.69 |
| 2008 | United Arab Emirates | 3.62 |
| 2011 | United Arab Emirates | 3.87 |
| 2014 | United Arab Emirates | 3.21 |
| 2017 | United Arab Emirates | 4.75 |
| 1996 | Libya | 35.63 |
| 2001 | Mauritania | 9.92 |
| 2010 | Mauritania | 7.94 |
| 2018 | Mauritania | 8.03 |
| 2000 | Morocco | 25.42 |
| 2005 | Morocco | 13.54 |
| 2007 | Morocco | 10.04 |
| 2013 | Oman | 2.45 |
| 2017 | Oman | 1.73 |
| 2002 | Qatar | 4.28 |
| 2004 | Qatar | 5.12 |
| 2008 | Qatar | 3.7 |
| 2011 | Qatar | 4.42 |
| 2015 | Qatar | 3.37 |
| 1993 | Algeria | 15.44 |
| 1997 | Algeria | 16.93 |
| 2001 | Algeria | 15.16 |
| 2003 | Algeria | 11.97 |
| 2005 | Algeria | 10.23 |
| 2006 | Algeria | 9.93 |
| 2009 | Algeria | 9.36 |
| 2015 | Algeria | 8.27 |
| 2016 | Algeria | 8.85 |
| 2017 | Algeria | 9.38 |
| 2018 | Algeria | 9.98 |
| 2020 | Algeria | 10.16 |
| 2005 | Bahrain | 5.14 |
| 2007 | Bahrain | 4.48 |
| 2009 | Bahrain | 4.61 |
| 2010 | Bahrain | 5.15 |
| 2011 | Bahrain | 3.15 |
| 2013 | Bahrain | 3.76 |
| 2017 | Bahrain | 7.83 |
| 2019 | Bahrain | 3.5 |
| 2013 | Comoros | 6.48 |
| 2015 | Comoros | 5.04 |
| 1998 | Djibouti | 56.72 |
| 2005 | Djibouti | 26.31 |
| 2009 | Djibouti | 17.27 |
| 2011 | Djibouti | 17.7 |
| 2012 | Djibouti | 17.7 |
| 1995 | Egypt | 17.05 |
| 2004 | Egypt | 10.63 |
| 2005 | Egypt | 8.76 |
| 2011 | Egypt | 7.71 |
| 2013 | Egypt | 8.55 |
| 2014 | Egypt | 7.43 |
| 2016 | Egypt | 6.63 |
| 2018 | Egypt | 8.19 |
| 2019 | Egypt | 10.43 |
| 2002 | Jordan | 12.66 |
| 2003 | Jordan | 11.44 |
| 2004 | Jordan | 11.23 |
| 2009 | Jordan | 5.13 |
| 2014 | Jordan | 4 |
| 2002 | Kuwait | 4.3 |
| 2003 | Kuwait | 4.52 |
| 2004 | Kuwait | 4.52 |
| 2005 | Kuwait | 3.91 |
| 2007 | Kuwait | 3.53 |
| 2010 | Kuwait | 3.94 |
| 2011 | Kuwait | 3.94 |
| 2014 | Kuwait | 3.14 |
| 2015 | Kuwait | 2.96 |
| 2017 | Kuwait | 4.34 |
| 2019 | Kuwait | 4.51 |
| 2020 | Kuwait | 3.01 |
| 1999 | Lebanon | 11.59 |
| 2001 | Lebanon | 8.36 |
| 2006 | Lebanon | 4.32 |
| 2016 | Lebanon | 2.98 |
| 2017 | Lebanon | 3.76 |
| 2019 | Lebanon | 3.33 |
| 2016 | Palestine | 1.12 |
Arab Region | Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (Arab countries, 1990–2020)
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.
Publisher
Arab Development Portal
Origin
Arab Region
Records
289
Source