Austria | Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI)
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. Limitations and exceptions: A positive net depletion figure for forest resources implies that the harvest rate exceeds the rate of natural growth; this is not the same as deforestation, which represents a change in land use. In principle, there should be an addition to savings in countries where growth exceeds harvest, but empirical estimates suggest that most of this net growth is in forested areas that cannot currently be exploited economically. Because the depletion estimates reflect only timber values, they ignore all the external and nontimber benefits associated with standing forests.
Publisher
The World Bank
Origin
Republic of Austria
Records
63
Source
Austria | Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI)
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
0.03634703 1970
0.04443094 1971
0.0443359 1972
0.0366604 1973
0.02704227 1974
0.0180293 1975
0.06212151 1976
0.04609191 1977
0.04191572 1978
0.07046901 1979
0.06967452 1980
0.06716597 1981
0.04848103 1982
0.04503524 1983
0.04859109 1984
0.05095416 1985
0.03582125 1986
0.02803054 1987
0.03992805 1988
0.05799152 1989
0.05635352 1990
0.03238203 1991
0.01186215 1992
0.01154155 1993
0.02296525 1994
0.01888922 1995
0.02740089 1996
0.02407696 1997
0.01554825 1998
0.01376479 1999
0.01090576 2000
0.01523094 2001
0.02770819 2002
0.03772134 2003
0.02853772 2004
0.03015175 2005
0.04264222 2006
0.05526571 2007
0.05830435 2008
0.04003291 2009
0.04845736 2010
0.04794603 2011
0.04186169 2012
0.04046508 2013
0.04031341 2014
0.04071593 2015
0.0348138 2016
0.03317559 2017
0.04501962 2018
0.03331582 2019
0.02276957 2020
0.02907175 2021
2022
Austria | Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI)
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. Limitations and exceptions: A positive net depletion figure for forest resources implies that the harvest rate exceeds the rate of natural growth; this is not the same as deforestation, which represents a change in land use. In principle, there should be an addition to savings in countries where growth exceeds harvest, but empirical estimates suggest that most of this net growth is in forested areas that cannot currently be exploited economically. Because the depletion estimates reflect only timber values, they ignore all the external and nontimber benefits associated with standing forests.
Publisher
The World Bank
Origin
Republic of Austria
Records
63
Source