CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high)
Quality of public administration assesses the extent to which civilian central government staff is structured to design and implement government policy and deliver services effectively. Limitations and exceptions: The CPIA exercise is intended to capture the quality of a country's policies and institutional arrangements, focusing on key elements that are within the country's control, rather than on outcomes (such as economic growth rates) that are influenced by events beyond the country's control. More specifically, the CPIA measures the extent to which a country's policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction and, consequently, the effective use of development assistance.
| country_code | year | value |
|---|---|---|
| AFG | 2005 | |
| AGO | 2005 | 2.5 |
| ARM | 2005 | 4 |
| BDI | 2005 | 2.5 |
| BEN | 2005 | 3 |
| BFA | 2005 | 3.5 |
| BGD | 2005 | 3 |
| BIH | 2005 | 3 |
| BOL | 2005 | 3.5 |
| BTN | 2005 | 4 |
| CAF | 2005 | 2 |
| CIV | 2005 | 2 |
| CMR | 2005 | 3 |
| COD | 2005 | 2.5 |
| COG | 2005 | 2.5 |
| COM | 2005 | 2 |
| CPV | 2005 | 4 |
| DJI | 2005 | 2.5 |
| DMA | 2005 | 3.5 |
| ERI | 2005 | 3 |
| ETH | 2005 | 3 |
| FJI | 2005 | |
| FSM | 2005 | |
| GEO | 2005 | 3.5 |
| GHA | 2005 | 3.5 |
| GIN | 2005 | 3 |
| GMB | 2005 | 3 |
| GNB | 2005 | 2.5 |
| GRD | 2005 | 3.5 |
| GUY | 2005 | 2.5 |
| HND | 2005 | 3 |
| HTI | 2005 | 2.5 |
| IND | 2005 | 3.5 |
| KEN | 2005 | 3 |
| KGZ | 2005 | 2.5 |
| KHM | 2005 | 2.5 |
| KIR | 2005 | 3 |
| LAO | 2005 | 2.5 |
| LBR | 2005 | |
| LCA | 2005 | 3.5 |
| LKA | 2005 | 3 |
| LSO | 2005 | 3 |
| MDA | 2005 | 3 |
| MDG | 2005 | 3.5 |
| MDV | 2005 | 4 |
| MHL | 2005 | |
| MLI | 2005 | 3 |
| MMR | 2005 | |
| MNG | 2005 | 3.5 |
| MOZ | 2005 | 3 |
| MRT | 2005 | 3 |
| MWI | 2005 | 3.5 |
| NER | 2005 | 3 |
| NGA | 2005 | 2.5 |
| NIC | 2005 | 3.5 |
| NPL | 2005 | 3 |
| PAK | 2005 | 3.5 |
| PNG | 2005 | 3 |
| RWA | 2005 | 3.5 |
| SDN | 2005 | 2.5 |
| SEN | 2005 | 3.5 |
| SLB | 2005 | 2 |
| SLE | 2005 | 3 |
| SOM | 2005 | |
| SSD | 2005 | |
| STP | 2005 | 3 |
| TCD | 2005 | 2.5 |
| TGO | 2005 | 2 |
| TJK | 2005 | 2.5 |
| TLS | 2005 | |
| TON | 2005 | 2.5 |
| TUV | 2005 | |
| TZA | 2005 | 3.5 |
| UGA | 2005 | 3 |
| UZB | 2005 | 2.5 |
| VCT | 2005 | 3.5 |
| VNM | 2005 | 3.5 |
| VUT | 2005 | 2.5 |
| WSM | 2005 | 4 |
| XKX | 2005 | |
| YEM | 2005 | 3 |
| ZMB | 2005 | 3 |
| ZWE | 2005 | 2 |
| AFG | 2006 | 2 |
| AGO | 2006 | 2.5 |
| ARM | 2006 | 4 |
| BDI | 2006 | 2.5 |
| BEN | 2006 | 3 |
| BFA | 2006 | 3.5 |
| BGD | 2006 | 3 |
| BIH | 2006 | 3 |
| BOL | 2006 | 3 |
| BTN | 2006 | 4 |
| CAF | 2006 | 2 |
| CIV | 2006 | 2 |
| CMR | 2006 | 3 |
| COD | 2006 | 2.5 |
| COG | 2006 | 2.5 |
| COM | 2006 | 2 |
| CPV | 2006 | 4 |
CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high)
Quality of public administration assesses the extent to which civilian central government staff is structured to design and implement government policy and deliver services effectively. Limitations and exceptions: The CPIA exercise is intended to capture the quality of a country's policies and institutional arrangements, focusing on key elements that are within the country's control, rather than on outcomes (such as economic growth rates) that are influenced by events beyond the country's control. More specifically, the CPIA measures the extent to which a country's policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction and, consequently, the effective use of development assistance.