Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day (2011 PPP) (% of population)
Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day is the percentage of the population living on less than $1.90 a day at 2011 international prices. As a result of revisions in PPP exchange rates, poverty rates for individual countries cannot be compared with poverty rates reported in earlier editions. Limitations and exceptions: Despite progress in the last decade, the challenges of measuring poverty remain. The timeliness, frequency, quality, and comparability of household surveys need to increase substantially, particularly in the poorest countries. The availability and quality of poverty monitoring data remains low in small states, countries with fragile situations, and low-income countries and even some middle-income countries. The low frequency and lack of comparability of the data available in some countries create uncertainty over the magnitude of poverty reduction.
Besides the frequency and timeliness of survey data, other data quality issues arise in measuring household living standards. The surveys ask detailed questions on sources of income and how it was spent, which must be carefully recorded by trained personnel. Income is generally more difficult to measure accurately, and consumption comes closer to the notion of living standards. And income can vary over time even if living standards do not. But consumption data are not always available: the latest estimates reported here use consumption data for about two-thirds of countries.
However, even similar surveys may not be strictly comparable because of differences in timing or in the quality and training of enumerators. Comparisons of countries at different levels of development also pose a potential problem because of differences in the relative importance of the consumption of nonmarket goods. The local market value of all consumption in kind (including own production, particularly important in underdeveloped rural economies) should be included in total consumption expenditure but may not be. Most survey data now include valuations for consumption or income from own production, but valuation methods vary.
| country_code | year | value |
|---|---|---|
| ABW | 1990 | |
| AFG | 1990 | |
| AGO | 1990 | |
| ALB | 1990 | |
| AND | 1990 | |
| ARB | 1990 | |
| ARE | 1990 | |
| ARG | 1990 | |
| ARM | 1990 | |
| ASM | 1990 | |
| ATG | 1990 | |
| AUS | 1990 | |
| AUT | 1990 | |
| AZE | 1990 | |
| BDI | 1990 | |
| BEL | 1990 | |
| BEN | 1990 | |
| BFA | 1990 | |
| BGD | 1990 | |
| BGR | 1990 | |
| BHR | 1990 | |
| BHS | 1990 | |
| BIH | 1990 | |
| BLR | 1990 | |
| BLZ | 1990 | |
| BMU | 1990 | |
| BOL | 1990 | 7.1 |
| BRA | 1990 | 21.6 |
| BRB | 1990 | |
| BRN | 1990 | |
| BTN | 1990 | |
| BWA | 1990 | |
| CAF | 1990 | |
| CAN | 1990 | |
| CHE | 1990 | |
| CHI | 1990 | |
| CHL | 1990 | 8.1 |
| CHN | 1990 | 66.6 |
| CIV | 1990 | |
| CMR | 1990 | |
| COD | 1990 | |
| COG | 1990 | |
| COL | 1990 | |
| COM | 1990 | |
| CPV | 1990 | |
| CRI | 1990 | 9.9 |
| CUB | 1990 | |
| CUW | 1990 | |
| CYM | 1990 | |
| CYP | 1990 | |
| CZE | 1990 | |
| DEU | 1990 | |
| DJI | 1990 | |
| DMA | 1990 | |
| DNK | 1990 | |
| DOM | 1990 | |
| DZA | 1990 | |
| EAP | 1990 | |
| EAS | 1990 | 61.6 |
| ECA | 1990 | |
| ECS | 1990 | |
| ECU | 1990 | |
| EGY | 1990 | 7.4 |
| EMU | 1990 | |
| ERI | 1990 | |
| ESP | 1990 | |
| EST | 1990 | |
| ETH | 1990 | |
| EUU | 1990 | |
| FIN | 1990 | |
| FJI | 1990 | |
| FRA | 1990 | |
| FRO | 1990 | |
| FSM | 1990 | |
| GAB | 1990 | |
| GBR | 1990 | |
| GEO | 1990 | |
| GHA | 1990 | |
| GIB | 1990 | |
| GIN | 1990 | |
| GMB | 1990 | |
| GNB | 1990 | |
| GNQ | 1990 | |
| GRC | 1990 | |
| GRD | 1990 | |
| GRL | 1990 | |
| GTM | 1990 | |
| GUM | 1990 | |
| GUY | 1990 | |
| HIC | 1990 | 0.6 |
| HKG | 1990 | |
| HND | 1990 | 44.3 |
| HPC | 1990 | |
| HRV | 1990 | |
| HTI | 1990 | |
| HUN | 1990 | |
| IDN | 1990 | 58.8 |
| IMN | 1990 | |
| IND | 1990 | |
| IRL | 1990 |
Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day (2011 PPP) (% of population)
Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day is the percentage of the population living on less than $1.90 a day at 2011 international prices. As a result of revisions in PPP exchange rates, poverty rates for individual countries cannot be compared with poverty rates reported in earlier editions. Limitations and exceptions: Despite progress in the last decade, the challenges of measuring poverty remain. The timeliness, frequency, quality, and comparability of household surveys need to increase substantially, particularly in the poorest countries. The availability and quality of poverty monitoring data remains low in small states, countries with fragile situations, and low-income countries and even some middle-income countries. The low frequency and lack of comparability of the data available in some countries create uncertainty over the magnitude of poverty reduction.
Besides the frequency and timeliness of survey data, other data quality issues arise in measuring household living standards. The surveys ask detailed questions on sources of income and how it was spent, which must be carefully recorded by trained personnel. Income is generally more difficult to measure accurately, and consumption comes closer to the notion of living standards. And income can vary over time even if living standards do not. But consumption data are not always available: the latest estimates reported here use consumption data for about two-thirds of countries.
However, even similar surveys may not be strictly comparable because of differences in timing or in the quality and training of enumerators. Comparisons of countries at different levels of development also pose a potential problem because of differences in the relative importance of the consumption of nonmarket goods. The local market value of all consumption in kind (including own production, particularly important in underdeveloped rural economies) should be included in total consumption expenditure but may not be. Most survey data now include valuations for consumption or income from own production, but valuation methods vary.