Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day (2011 PPP) (% of population)

Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day is the percentage of the population living on less than $1.90 a day at 2011 international prices. As a result of revisions in PPP exchange rates, poverty rates for individual countries cannot be compared with poverty rates reported in earlier editions. Limitations and exceptions: Despite progress in the last decade, the challenges of measuring poverty remain. The timeliness, frequency, quality, and comparability of household surveys need to increase substantially, particularly in the poorest countries. The availability and quality of poverty monitoring data remains low in small states, countries with fragile situations, and low-income countries and even some middle-income countries. The low frequency and lack of comparability of the data available in some countries create uncertainty over the magnitude of poverty reduction. Besides the frequency and timeliness of survey data, other data quality issues arise in measuring household living standards. The surveys ask detailed questions on sources of income and how it was spent, which must be carefully recorded by trained personnel. Income is generally more difficult to measure accurately, and consumption comes closer to the notion of living standards. And income can vary over time even if living standards do not. But consumption data are not always available: the latest estimates reported here use consumption data for about two-thirds of countries. However, even similar surveys may not be strictly comparable because of differences in timing or in the quality and training of enumerators. Comparisons of countries at different levels of development also pose a potential problem because of differences in the relative importance of the consumption of nonmarket goods. The local market value of all consumption in kind (including own production, particularly important in underdeveloped rural economies) should be included in total consumption expenditure but may not be. Most survey data now include valuations for consumption or income from own production, but valuation methods vary.
Publisher
The World Bank
Origin
Global
Records
2000
Source
Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day (2011 PPP) (% of population)
country_code year value
ABW 1990
AFG 1990
AGO 1990
ALB 1990
AND 1990
ARB 1990
ARE 1990
ARG 1990
ARM 1990
ASM 1990
ATG 1990
AUS 1990
AUT 1990
AZE 1990
BDI 1990
BEL 1990
BEN 1990
BFA 1990
BGD 1990
BGR 1990
BHR 1990
BHS 1990
BIH 1990
BLR 1990
BLZ 1990
BMU 1990
BOL 1990 7.1
BRA 1990 21.6
BRB 1990
BRN 1990
BTN 1990
BWA 1990
CAF 1990
CAN 1990
CHE 1990
CHI 1990
CHL 1990 8.1
CHN 1990 66.6
CIV 1990
CMR 1990
COD 1990
COG 1990
COL 1990
COM 1990
CPV 1990
CRI 1990 9.9
CUB 1990
CUW 1990
CYM 1990
CYP 1990
CZE 1990
DEU 1990
DJI 1990
DMA 1990
DNK 1990
DOM 1990
DZA 1990
EAP 1990
EAS 1990 61.6
ECA 1990
ECS 1990
ECU 1990
EGY 1990 7.4
EMU 1990
ERI 1990
ESP 1990
EST 1990
ETH 1990
EUU 1990
FIN 1990
FJI 1990
FRA 1990
FRO 1990
FSM 1990
GAB 1990
GBR 1990
GEO 1990
GHA 1990
GIB 1990
GIN 1990
GMB 1990
GNB 1990
GNQ 1990
GRC 1990
GRD 1990
GRL 1990
GTM 1990
GUM 1990
GUY 1990
HIC 1990 0.6
HKG 1990
HND 1990 44.3
HPC 1990
HRV 1990
HTI 1990
HUN 1990
IDN 1990 58.8
IMN 1990
IND 1990
IRL 1990

Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day (2011 PPP) (% of population)

Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day is the percentage of the population living on less than $1.90 a day at 2011 international prices. As a result of revisions in PPP exchange rates, poverty rates for individual countries cannot be compared with poverty rates reported in earlier editions. Limitations and exceptions: Despite progress in the last decade, the challenges of measuring poverty remain. The timeliness, frequency, quality, and comparability of household surveys need to increase substantially, particularly in the poorest countries. The availability and quality of poverty monitoring data remains low in small states, countries with fragile situations, and low-income countries and even some middle-income countries. The low frequency and lack of comparability of the data available in some countries create uncertainty over the magnitude of poverty reduction. Besides the frequency and timeliness of survey data, other data quality issues arise in measuring household living standards. The surveys ask detailed questions on sources of income and how it was spent, which must be carefully recorded by trained personnel. Income is generally more difficult to measure accurately, and consumption comes closer to the notion of living standards. And income can vary over time even if living standards do not. But consumption data are not always available: the latest estimates reported here use consumption data for about two-thirds of countries. However, even similar surveys may not be strictly comparable because of differences in timing or in the quality and training of enumerators. Comparisons of countries at different levels of development also pose a potential problem because of differences in the relative importance of the consumption of nonmarket goods. The local market value of all consumption in kind (including own production, particularly important in underdeveloped rural economies) should be included in total consumption expenditure but may not be. Most survey data now include valuations for consumption or income from own production, but valuation methods vary.
Publisher
The World Bank
Origin
Global
Records
2000
Source