Republic of the Marshall Islands | Territory of the French Southern and Antarctic Lands | Northern Ireland | Vatican City State | Republic of Namibia | Greenland | Territory of Norfolk Island | Republic of Nauru | United States Minor Outlying Islands | Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China | England | Antarctica | Wales | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | Bailiwick of Guernsey | Bouvet Island | British Indian Ocean Territory | Western Sahara | Territory of Christmas Island | Falkland Islands | Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands | Territory of the Wallis and Futuna Islands | Svalbard and Jan Mayen | Collectivity of Saint-Barthélemy | Territory of the Cocos (Keeling) Islands | Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha | Isle of Man | South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands | Pitcairn, Henderson, Ducie and Oeno Islands | Republic of Kosovo | Department of Mayotte | Bailiwick of Jersey | Principality of Monaco | Tokelau | Scotland | Åland Islands | Procedures - Women (number)
The number of procedures for women records all the procedures required in practice for five female married entrepreneurs to start and operate a local limited liability company. A procedure is de?ned as any interaction of the company founders with external parties or spouses (if legally required). Both pre- and post-incorporation procedures that are officially required or commonly done in practice are recorded. Development relevance: Where the rules are excessively burdensome, resource-constrained entrepreneurs might not have the opportunity to turn their ideas into a business. More generally, making it difficult to start a business may prevent an economy and its private sector from reaping the benefits of business formalization. In fact, a growing body of empirical research shows a positive correlation between business entry regulations and social and economic outcomes. Economies with high levels of formal entrepreneurship also benefit from higher levels of employment and enhanced economic growth. Moreover, as more businesses formalize, the tax base expands, which enables governments to spend on productivity-enhancing areas and pursue other social and economic policy objectives. Conversely, economies with overly cumbersome regulations for starting a business are associated with higher levels of informality and corruption as well as a smaller tax base. Limitations and exceptions: The Doing Business methodology has five limitations that should be considered when interpreting the data. First, for most economies the collected data refer to businesses in the largest business city and may not be representative of regulation in other parts of the economy. Second, the data often focus on a specific business form—generally a limited liability company (or its legal equivalent) of a specified size—and may not be representative of the regulation on other businesses. Third, transactions described in a standardized case scenario refer to a specific set of issues and may not represent the full set of issues that a business encounters. Fourth, the measures of time involve an element of judgment by the expert respondents. When sources indicate different estimates, the time indicators reported in Doing Business represent the median values of several responses given under the assumptions of the standardized case. Finally, the methodology assumes that a business has full information on what is required and does not waste time when completing procedures. In practice, completing a procedure may take longer if the business lacks information or is unable to follow up promptly. Alternatively, the business may choose to disregard some burdensome procedures. For both reasons the time delays reported in Doing Business would differ from the recollection of entrepreneurs reported in the World Bank Group Enterprise questionnaires or other firm-level questionnaires.. Statistical concept and methodology: Data are collected by the World Bank Group with a standardized questionnaire that uses a simple business case to ensure comparability across economies and over time—with assumptions about the legal form of the business, its size, its location and nature of its operation. Questionnaires are administered to more than 13,800 local experts, including lawyers, business consultants, accountants, freight forwarders, government officials and other professionals routinely administering or advising on legal and regulatory requirements. The Doing Business data are based on a detailed reading of domestic laws, regulations and administrative requirements as well as their implementation in practice as experienced by private firms. The report covers 190 economies—including some of the smallest and poorest economies, for which little or no data are available from other sources. The data are collected through several rounds of communication with expert respondents (both private sector practitioners and government officials), through responses to questionnaires, conference calls, written correspondence and visits by the team. Doing Business relies on four main sources of information: the relevant laws and regulations, Doing Business respondents, the governments of the economies covered and the World Bank Group regional staff.
Publisher
The World Bank
Origin
Åland Islands
Records
17
Source
Create chart Download showed records Download Full dataset
Republic of the Marshall Islands | Territory of the French Southern and Antarctic Lands | Northern Ireland | Vatican City State | Republic of Namibia | Greenland | Territory of Norfolk Island | Republic of Nauru | United States Minor Outlying Islands | Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China | England | Antarctica | Wales | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | Bailiwick of Guernsey | Bouvet Island | British Indian Ocean Territory | Western Sahara | Territory of Christmas Island | Falkland Islands | Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands | Territory of the Wallis and Futuna Islands | Svalbard and Jan Mayen | Collectivity of Saint-Barthélemy | Territory of the Cocos (Keeling) Islands | Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha | Isle of Man | South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands | Pitcairn, Henderson, Ducie and Oeno Islands | Republic of Kosovo | Department of Mayotte | Bailiwick of Jersey | Principality of Monaco | Tokelau | Scotland | Åland Islands | Procedures - Women (number)
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
9 2010
10 2011
10 2012
8 2013
5 2014
4 2015
4 2016
3 2017
3 2018
3 2019
3 2020
Republic of the Marshall Islands | Territory of the French Southern and Antarctic Lands | Northern Ireland | Vatican City State | Republic of Namibia | Greenland | Territory of Norfolk Island | Republic of Nauru | United States Minor Outlying Islands | Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China | England | Antarctica | Wales | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | Bailiwick of Guernsey | Bouvet Island | British Indian Ocean Territory | Western Sahara | Territory of Christmas Island | Falkland Islands | Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands | Territory of the Wallis and Futuna Islands | Svalbard and Jan Mayen | Collectivity of Saint-Barthélemy | Territory of the Cocos (Keeling) Islands | Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha | Isle of Man | South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands | Pitcairn, Henderson, Ducie and Oeno Islands | Republic of Kosovo | Department of Mayotte | Bailiwick of Jersey | Principality of Monaco | Tokelau | Scotland | Åland Islands | Procedures - Women (number)
The number of procedures for women records all the procedures required in practice for five female married entrepreneurs to start and operate a local limited liability company. A procedure is de?ned as any interaction of the company founders with external parties or spouses (if legally required). Both pre- and post-incorporation procedures that are officially required or commonly done in practice are recorded. Development relevance: Where the rules are excessively burdensome, resource-constrained entrepreneurs might not have the opportunity to turn their ideas into a business. More generally, making it difficult to start a business may prevent an economy and its private sector from reaping the benefits of business formalization. In fact, a growing body of empirical research shows a positive correlation between business entry regulations and social and economic outcomes. Economies with high levels of formal entrepreneurship also benefit from higher levels of employment and enhanced economic growth. Moreover, as more businesses formalize, the tax base expands, which enables governments to spend on productivity-enhancing areas and pursue other social and economic policy objectives. Conversely, economies with overly cumbersome regulations for starting a business are associated with higher levels of informality and corruption as well as a smaller tax base. Limitations and exceptions: The Doing Business methodology has five limitations that should be considered when interpreting the data. First, for most economies the collected data refer to businesses in the largest business city and may not be representative of regulation in other parts of the economy. Second, the data often focus on a specific business form—generally a limited liability company (or its legal equivalent) of a specified size—and may not be representative of the regulation on other businesses. Third, transactions described in a standardized case scenario refer to a specific set of issues and may not represent the full set of issues that a business encounters. Fourth, the measures of time involve an element of judgment by the expert respondents. When sources indicate different estimates, the time indicators reported in Doing Business represent the median values of several responses given under the assumptions of the standardized case. Finally, the methodology assumes that a business has full information on what is required and does not waste time when completing procedures. In practice, completing a procedure may take longer if the business lacks information or is unable to follow up promptly. Alternatively, the business may choose to disregard some burdensome procedures. For both reasons the time delays reported in Doing Business would differ from the recollection of entrepreneurs reported in the World Bank Group Enterprise questionnaires or other firm-level questionnaires.. Statistical concept and methodology: Data are collected by the World Bank Group with a standardized questionnaire that uses a simple business case to ensure comparability across economies and over time—with assumptions about the legal form of the business, its size, its location and nature of its operation. Questionnaires are administered to more than 13,800 local experts, including lawyers, business consultants, accountants, freight forwarders, government officials and other professionals routinely administering or advising on legal and regulatory requirements. The Doing Business data are based on a detailed reading of domestic laws, regulations and administrative requirements as well as their implementation in practice as experienced by private firms. The report covers 190 economies—including some of the smallest and poorest economies, for which little or no data are available from other sources. The data are collected through several rounds of communication with expert respondents (both private sector practitioners and government officials), through responses to questionnaires, conference calls, written correspondence and visits by the team. Doing Business relies on four main sources of information: the relevant laws and regulations, Doing Business respondents, the governments of the economies covered and the World Bank Group regional staff.
Publisher
The World Bank
Origin
Åland Islands
Records
17
Source
Create chart Download showed records Download Full dataset